Taking Control at Home Spreading wings abroad
19 October 2016Minister S.B. Dissanayake on Monday said at a media briefing at the SLFP Headquarters that "the President had issued a statement regarding the functioning of the CID, FCID and CIABOC to clear any misunderstanding that the President was involved in a witch hunt against his opponents and was responsible for having them summoned by the CID, FCID and CIABOC."
Dissanayake added that the President did not interfere in the functions of those independent bodies.
Some could not resist the cheap jab that the presence of Disaster Management Minister Anura Priyadharshana Yapa meant the SLFP saw the razzmatazz generated by the President's statement serious enough to merit a public statement meant to douse negative speculation. The public debate however, is whether or not there has been a subtle wet blanket thrown over the investigating agencies considering the very real negative impact by way of CIABOC Director General, a close friend of the Prime Minister, Dilrukshi Dias Wickramasinghe handing in her resignation.
The President was certainly expecting such a response and seems not in the least bit worried about who quits what. The rationale that supports the President's statement is that while the Police and these commissions go after fraudsters in the former regime, they have significantly left out any probes against anyone in the UNP. But then, no complaints have so far come to them about corruption involving UNPers. And that seems to have got the rumour mills working overtime wondering aloud whether they simply have the blinkers on or whether they choose to report what they choose to report to the Police and the commissions.
Of course, having been out of power for ten years perhaps gave the then Opposition no avenues to exploit by way of slick mega deals by the score. But to be objective about all of this, whilst those against whom mega fraud allegations were made rightly had to be summoned by the Police and these commissions, perhaps, while justice cannot be selective, at least the process of justice could bend the rules if only as a token of extending to men such as Gotabaya Rajapaksa and former services commanders some little allowance in how they were treated in that process.
It was sickening to see Mr. Rajapaksa's picture behind bars splashed in the media as though he was a price catch for some unprincipled bloodhounds instead of a war hero just as much as Sarath Fonseka was a war hero. Two wrongs don't make a right. Even the halls of justice can exercise its powers and obligations in a manner that is ennobling and not emasculating, not unless we as a nation have forgotten what it is, in the words of Jesus Christ, to render unto Caesar what is Caesar's. Justice, can always in such a case be, as it must, the mere dispensation of a penalty under law instead of making it look like a lynch-party baying for blood as savages of ancient times did.
This, one feels, is what the President was getting at and not, as the JO and others suggested, an attempt by him to interfere in the processes of the law.
Premier Wickremesinghe would be the first to acknowledge that fact and unlike in the Mahendran affair, to his credit he did not try to influence events in even a subtle manner aimed at retaining Dilrukshi Wickramasinghe in her position.
Looking at this in the correct perspective it would appear that the government remains steady, much to the chagrin of the JO and its other critics.
The government, now, seems well set to last the five-year distance. It's well set for no other reason other than the fact that the President and Prime Minster and those of sound mind who back them to the hilt, know that the government's even handed non-aligned foreign policy is the only way out for the country to seriously plan a phased-out economic revival. Its foreign policy ensures good relations with all governments and this was quietly underscored when Sirisena at the BRICS-BIMSTEC Summit in Goa received from Russian President Vladimir Putin as a warm welcome as he did from Obama earlier this year. That Sirisena and Indian Premier Modi are on the same track can augur well for South Asia now that SAARC can be considered (some won't agree) a non-starter. This does not mean that Pakistan cannot play a still more meaningful role in the region as a more vital member of BIMSTEC, which indeed can prove a more conducive element in working out a solution to Kashmir.
Perhaps Bhutanese PM Tshering Tobgay was more pessimistic than he meant to be when he said, "Let's not bury SAARC yet". He could not have been wanting to sound SAARCastic!