Wednesday, February 1, 2017

Ceylon Today Editorial

Trumpism similar to Nazism

02 February 2017

US President Donald Trump's recent visitor ban on citizens from seven Muslim majority countries, at least being temporarily debarred from visiting the USA, is similar to what Adolph Hitler did to the former Weimar Republic of Germany after he 'seized' power 84 years ago in 1933.

Nazi Germany's first shots of racial discrimination began with the ban of Jews, its own citizens, from holding jobs in the public sector and ending up, six years later, by sending them to concentration camps, to, finally, six million of the Jewry, including those from the occupied territories, ending up in the gas chambers, also within a mere six years.

Trump however hasn't taken action against his own country's Muslim citizens, neither has he removed them from employment from the public sector, not at least yet, other than banning citizens from four Arab countries, two Sub-Saharan countries and also from Iran, from visiting the USA, allegedly due to fears of Islamist terrorism, no other punitive action has been taken against Muslims.

The four Arab countries are Libya, Syria, Iraq and Yemen and the Sub Saharan countries, Sudan and Somalia.

Meanwhile, Hitler's persecution of the Jews was on the premise that they were the fountain of all evil, while Trump's banning of tourists/migrants from the aforesaid seven countries are due to fears that they are exporters of Islamist terrorism.

Hitler's carrot to win over the German people and to wrest power was the inglorious surrender of their country to the allies in November 1918, the hardships imposed on the German people due to the war reparations and loss of territory under the

Versailles Treaty and, finally, the millions thrown out of employment due to the Great Depression of 1929.

On the other hand, Trump's USA faced no such humiliation or hardships from the rest of the world. On the contrary, it was the USA, pre-Trump, that was responsible for leading to the imposition of sanctions and other restrictions to other countries such as Russia and Iran.

The only hardship that the USA faced in the last decade was the global financial crisis of 2007, which was of its own making (in as much as World Wars I and II were Germany's own making), followed by the Great Recession, two years later, in 2009.

But, in the case of the USA, despite these economic crises (and not military) it is still the world's number one power, both economically and militarily. Also, since then, its economy has recovered to provide full employment to its people.

Since 9/11 which took place nearly 16 years ago, the USA, afterwards, hasn't faced any physical and human destruction of that magnitude, either due to Islamist terrorism or for any other reason for that matter, thereafter, up to now.

According to Wikipedia, the hijackers of the '9/11' attack numbered 19. Of that number, 15 were from Saudi Arabia, two from the UAE and one each from Egypt and Lebanon, respectively. But none of the citizens from these five countries are in Trump's banned list.

According to CNN, the seven countries in Trump's red list originally emanated from his immediate predecessor Barack Obama's 'countries of concern' watch. However, Obama's law, over a period of time, only placed limited restrictions on certain travellers who had visited Iran, Iraq, Sudan, Syria, Libya, Somalia, or Yemen, CNN said.

Those restrictions limited 'visa-waiver travel' by those who had visited one of the seven countries on or after 1 March 2011.

People from those countries who previously could have entered the USA without a visa were instead required to apply for one if they had travelled to one of the seven countries under Obama law, said CNN, unlike Trump's carte blanche travel ban applicable to citizens from those countries which prevents them from entering the USA.

In that aspect, CNN, quoting White House Press Secretary Sean Spicer said: 'There were further travel restrictions already in place from those seven countries.'

This is a gross exaggeration by Spicer, who doesn't seem to know the difference between a blanket travel ban, albeit, allegedly temporary, as opposed to 'restricted travel' under Obama law.

Trump's entry ban may be a move that revives USA's isolationist mentality that previously remained latent for 76 years since the Japanese bombing of Pearl Harbour on 7 December 1941, which dragged it to World War II. Similarly, it was only three years after the outbreak of World War I that the USA entered the war, siding with the allies led by the UK in 1917 against Germany and her allies, which hastened the conclusion of World War I a year later in 1918.

A mixture of isolationism, now spiced by xenophobism, appears to define Trumpism. While the former is part of the American ethos, the latter smacks of Nazism.

In this era of globalization and post Nazism, neither isolationism nor xenophobism has a place under the Sun. Therefore, the demise of Trumpism may take place sooner, than later.

Daily News Editorial

A salute to “Rata Viruvo”

02 February 2017

More than two million Sri Lankans are living abroad, of which around 1.5 million are working in regions and countries such as the Middle East, South Korea, Italy, Hong Kong and Singapore. They are expatriates who have gone abroad on a temporary basis and retain their Sri Lankan citizenship.

They regularly send funds back to their families in Sri Lanka. This has become the biggest foreign exchange earning avenue for the country, beating traditional exports and tourism. In fact, foreign remittances reached a record high last year with a total of Rs 1,054.5 billion being sent to the country by Sri Lankans working abroad.

This is an 11.11 percent increase from 2015 where the country earned Rs.949 billion in foreign remittances, according to the Ministry of Foreign Employment. Remittances now make up the single largest earner of foreign exchange into the country and in 2015 it comprised 66.56 percent of all foreign exchange earnings. This is a great achievement, but there is still room for improvement.

The authorities must be commended for their efforts to ensure that foreign job seekers go through the proper channels. It is only then that they can step in if the job contract is not honoured properly or various problems arise at the other end. The Foreign Employment Bureau’s booth at the Bandaranaike International Airport (temporarily closed till April 6 due to airport repairs) is a good idea, because it helps identify anyone who has not followed the due registration process. It can seem like a hassle to travellers going on visitor visas to Middle East countries, but there is a need to identify and have a database of those going abroad for employment.

Tough action should be taken against rogue employment agencies which dupe job seekers as well as government agencies by providing false information. A list of approved job agents (as well as blacklisted ones) should be published in the newspapers in all three languages, the same way the Central Bank publishes a list of approved banks and financial institutions. Fortunately, authorities have been able to weed out many of the offending agencies.

The authorities should explore the possibility of sending only skilled workers, male or female. Although training is given to prospective domestic workers on some aspects of their job, it does not seem to be sufficient. They should identify jobs available for skilled persons and try to direct more people towards them. More training opportunities should be provided for those willing to learn a new skill, say, welding or repairing cars.

Language is another barrier that should be overcome. South Korea demands that everyone who comes there for work has a sufficient knowledge of their native language. Although there is no such rule in the Middle East, at least a rudimentary knowledge of Arabic will not go waste. Learning the host country’s main language should be made compulsory for all foreign job applicants – for example for Saudi Arabia it should be Arabic.

The overwhelming majority of foreign job seekers are women, which does create various problems in families and the entire society. The SLBFE and our missions abroad must negotiate more openings for our males in the Middle East and elsewhere. If we can send more skilled male workers and professionals such as engineers abroad, the country will earn more foreign exchange as they are better paid.

It is also time to end the over-reliance on the Middle East for foreign employment. Our authorities should explore job markets in many other developed and even emerging countries. The pay and facilities are much better in these countries. If more jobs are secured in developed countries, the authorities will be able to resolve another issue at least to some extent: illegal migration. If rich countries can open up their employment markets to the developing world, at least for those jobs which may not be so appealing to the domestic population, it could go a long way towards addressing the illegal migration issue. Governments should work closely with the International Organization for Migration (IOM) in this regard.

Moreover, any new agreement signed with a host country must include built-in safeguards for protecting our citizens in any eventuality including harassment by employers, non-payment of salaries, denial of rights and arbitrary arrest and court cases. There should be a mechanism to provide immediate assistance to any Sri Lankan worker facing legal or other difficulties in a foreign land.

There should be more recognition and facilities for expatriate workers who toil for years to enrich their Motherland, beyond calling them “Rata Viruvo” (Foreign Employment Heroes). Even after working abroad for 10- years, the maximum duty free allowance they get is just US$ 1750 which is just about enough to buy a few household electronics and appliances. Expatriates who have worked abroad at least for 10 years at a stretch should be given a duty free permit to purchase at least a small city car. That is perhaps an apt gift for these Sri Lankans who give up the best years of their lives to earn for the country.