NOC favours and IOC code of ethics
05 November 2016The Sri Lanka National Olympic Committee (NOC) played dodge ball with the press for a long time. From time to time this dodge balling of the press resulted in the Minister of Sports being regularly pressed for answers regarding the Sports Act and related matters such as elections at NOC, by journalists. Although the NOC President was present at the press briefings, the Secretary who was the more important to be questioned was still missing. These mysterious matters with the NOC were the reason once, for the short-circuiting of relations with the International Olympic Committee (IOC).
The IOC permits NOCs to act on their own and whatever is to be taken up with the IOC has to pass through the NOC. This alone makes the NOC especially in Sri Lanka, an impenetrable fortress. They are all what they should not be, arrogant, incompetent, corrupt and abusers of power. They use their power as do dictators; NOC used it to such an extent of even not allowing the auditing of their finances. On the question of finances not being audited the NOC stood on grounds the monies were coming directly to them and it is not the responsibility of locals to audit those finances.
Such acts make it so clear of the power wielded by the NOC; the best evidence came recently at the meeting that had been arranged by the Sports Ministry. At this point it looked certain that the Sports Minister was very much interested in what the journalists had to say. Probably most of it the minister was already aware of; i.e. what appeared in news media up to then and what had been relayed to him by the journalists close to the ministry.
Most likely noticed was the body reactions of the head of the NOC and the departure that seemed to say he did not like what was going on, but held a poker face in front of the questioners' and most importantly the fact the Minister was there said it all.
When the questions focused on those who had been invited to into the fold to Rio, the answer was straight out of an Andare folklore. The fact that a puppet could not be let down was made to look like a story recently heard of a good Samaritan visiting a house and handing over a bagful of gems. The man begged for a place to join the Jing-bang and an order had been made to include him. So we believe, this type of unruly behaviour would have been in existence in the NOC ever since.
For someone used to an environment as such described earlier, to question of ethics in sport may not be a reality. The NOC chief must know that, as he says he has been in this environment for twenty two or so years. He must also remember that, that is precisely why the IOC exists.
Behaviour on the part of people is something not controllable; especially in sport it is something that has to be given a lot of thought in terms of having equal competition. Let us see how the IOC stands on sports and ethics. In keeping with the values and principles in the Olympic Charter the implementation of the Code of Ethics Committee proposals took place in 1999. The new happening was because of the need for closer investigations on new behavioural patterns in Olympic sports. The code of ethics applied to all stakeholders who had to respect its implementing to the utmost, and all NOCs were part of it.
Let me quote here from the latest edition "The 2016 edition of the collection 'Ethics' includes the IOC Code of Ethics and all its implementing provisions, including the Rules of Conduct for the Candidature Process Olympic Games 2024, the Rules Concerning Conflicts of Interests, the Basic Universal Principles of Good Governance of the Olympic and Sports Movement, the new Olympic Movement Code on the Prevention of the Manipulation of Competitions and its application for the Rio de Janeiro Olympic Games, the statutes of the Ethics Commission and its Rules of Procedure."
Conflict of interest here may have been meant for the games, but it is still the same issue with conflict of interest when it comes into play anywhere. The journalist in question held the issue on ethics of sending favoured persons to the Olympics, and for the head of NOC to ask "is there ethics in sports" shows how he cares about conflict of interest, from answers given. If the NOC was to stand by those ethics they would put good governance in the forefront they would not get entangled with athletes or journalists.