Wednesday, June 3, 2020

Daily News Editorial

A victory for democracy

A major hurdle for holding the 2020 General Election has been overcome with the dismissal of the Fundamental Rights petitions that challenged the dissolution of Parliament and the slated date for the poll (June 20). This can be described as a major victory for democracy and the franchise, since any further delay, the Coronavirus pandemic notwithstanding, would have further complicated the present imbroglio.

This verdict makes it clear that President Gotabaya Rajapaksa made the right call in dissolving Parliament and calling for a General Election. President Rajapaksa and others in the Government have made it clear that there was no Constitutional requirement per se for recalling the dissolved Parliament. As many of the respected President’s Counsel who made submissions observed, a “dead” Parliament cannot be brought back to life unless in the case of an exceptional emergency. They noted that the Coronavirus pandemic did not qualify as such a dire emergency, since it has been controlled to a great extent within our borders and there were no signs of community transmission. This is indeed a victory achieved by our heroic health personnel and Security Forces/Police/CDF personnel.

Now the onus is on the National Election Commission (NEC) to fix another date for the poll, since June 20 is out of the question for all intents and purposes. The NEC has already gone on record saying they need around 60-70 days to prepare for the polls, not to mention the need for political parties, independent groups and candidates to engage in propaganda. The NEC is likely to receive health guidelines for conducting the poll (also covering pre and post poll periods) from the Director General of Health Services and the Health Secretary today, which will enable it to fast track the preparatory phase. The health authorities had earlier indicated that the poll can be held subject to the relevant health and safety precautions being taken.

This brings us to the question of propaganda and campaigning. Politicians depend on huge public rallies and close interactions with the voters to drive their message home. It is still not known whether the health authorities will permit such gatherings due to the possibility of a second wave of the disease. But what are the alternatives available to the political parties and candidates ?

Posters are now passé due to environmental concerns and prohibitive costs. The electronic media should be an ideal outlet for propaganda, but it will be logistically and financially impossible to accommodate thousands of candidates on radio and TV – the two State-owned TV networks were overwhelmed trying to give time slots to the 35 presidential aspirants last year. However, it should still be possible to give air time on a limited basis for the leaders of all political parties to make a pitch for their respective candidates.

The other option is social media. With practically everyone in the country having two or more mobile phones, most politicians are already on social media 24x7 to interact with potential voters. But the problem with social media is the possibility for the dissemination of hate speech, fabrications and other defamatory or incendiary material by individual candidates who will be in the so-called “manape” (preference votes) tussle. Political parties must give clear guidelines to their candidates on the use of social media and also have a close tab on what they are saying over such platforms, which are hard to police.

The poll itself will be a novel experience for the NEC, political parties and the voters, since a poll has not been held here in living memory under the present circumstances. The NEC will essentially look for precedents from around the world. South Korea recently held a national election amidst the pandemic, which has since been described as the most successful election ever held in that country. Forty four million voters followed stringent guidelines to cast their vote. South Korea disinfected polling centres, and mandated that voters practise physical distancing, wear gloves and masks and use hand sanitizer. Voters had their temperatures checked on arrival at the booths. Those who had a temperature above 37.5 degrees Celsius were sent to booths in secluded areas. The COVID-19 affected and quarantined individuals were allowed to vote by post.

But South Korea is not the only country to have held elections during this period – eight other countries have done so successfully. India and Singapore are among the other countries that are planning to hold elections amidst the present conditions. This is inevitable because many health experts say the Coronavirus pandemic could last as long as two years – even if a vaccine is made available by this time next year, vaccinating seven billion people will not be an easy task. It would indeed be a violation of the people’s right to vote if an election were to be postponed by two or more years until the pathogen is wiped out. Thus the Supreme Court has reached the right verdict and now it is up to the NEC to deliver the goods.

The Island Editorial

Constitutional Covid-19

The Supreme Court (SC) having dismissed all fundamental rights petitions against the Election Commission (EC)’s decision to hold the next general election on 20 June, the EC can now go ahead with preparations for the much-delayed polls. Conducting the election on 20 June is not within the realm of possibility, and, obviously, the EC will have to decide on another date; it is meeting, next Monday, for that purpose, according to media reports. No EC decision will be legally valid unless there is unanimity among all three EC members. This is an absurd constitutional requirement, which has the potential to disrupt the electoral process.

Pro-government legal experts are of the view that the President and the Cabinet can govern the country even after the expiration of three months from the dissolution of the last Parliament until the election of the next Parliament. When will we be able to elect the next Parliament? There are also bound to arise some questions about parliamentary control over public finance.

Interestingly, the EC also drew fire for having set the date (20 June) for the general election beyond the constitutionally stipulated deadline (02 June). What made the EC do so is anyone’s guess, but now it can postpone the election even further! Until it decides on the date of the general election, the President and the Cabinet can govern the country. One may recall that during the failed constitutional coup in 2018, the then President Maithripala Sirisena ruled the country briefly without both Parliament and the Cabinet.

What if something unexpected happened and the general election could not be held in the near future? One can only hope that the national health emergency will be over soon and the situation will become conducive to the conduct of an election. All three branches of government must remain functional.

Meanwhile, if the provisions of a Constitution mean different things to different people and lead to frequent disputes, there is something fundamentally wrong with that basic law, and its defects warrant the urgent attention of the nation concerned. Hurriedly introduced amendments thereto only make the situation worse. The 19th Amendment has rendered the constitutional mess even bigger although it contains some salutary features. The less said about other constitutional amendments, especially the 18th one, the better. The 13th Amendment plunged the country into a bloodbath, but the Provincial Councils it created have remained defunct for a long time.

What Sri Lanka’s democracy is facing is constitutional Covid-19, so to speak. It must be handled with care if disaster is to be averted. At least, now, the political party leaders who wrap themselves in the flag and would have the public believe that they are even ready to die for the country should come together and reach a consensus on when the country can go to the polls. They must heed the expert opinion of the health authorities and follow the guideline set by the latter. Sorting out problems on the political front is a perquisite for preparing the country for the economic crisis, the like of which it has not experienced.