Tuesday, February 14, 2017

The Island Editorial

The heartless exploiting the hapless


The Dalai Lama has succinctly described the crass stupidity of modern-day humans who take their health for granted. Man, he has said, sacrifices his health in order to make money and then sacrifices money to recuperate his health. This explains why man has become a victim of the thriving healthcare industry. The Buddha has preached that health is wealth. Even a non-Buddhist who gets the shock of his life on being given a huge bill at a private hospital will agree with the Enlightened One!

How bad the situation would have been for the poor if not for the free healthcare system in this country is not difficult to guess. But, sadly, the public is still at the mercy of private hospitals owing to the many ills that the public health sector is afflicted with. Newspapers are full of heart-rending appeals from poor patients for public assistance as they cannot pay for life-saving operations in private hospitals. Successive governments have made no serious effort to develop the state-run hospital network and liberate the sick from the clutches of mudalalis. Budgetary allocations for the public health sector have recorded a steady decline.

However, the incumbent government has taken some progressive steps for the benefit of the sick. Health Minister Dr. Rajitha Senaratne is reported to have ordered that the prices of artificial eye lenses be slashed immediately. A lens imported from India is sold here with an average markup of 500%, according to the Health Ministry. This is a crime.

How can those who keep such a huge margin at the expense of visually impaired fellow citizens call themselves humans? The government must do everything in its power to stop this kind of exploitation of the sick. The incidence of cataract remains alarmingly high. The lens racket has been going on for a long time and it is high time it was tackled once and for all.

We usually have no civil word to say about politicians, especially government spokesmen who have no control over their restless tongues. But, credit where credit is due, Minister Senaratne has helped bring down the prices of some drugs much to the relief of the public though there is a long way to go before he can call the government drug policy a success. One may agree with his detractors that the Big Pharma is far from tamed, but the fact remains that some relief is better than no relief at all.

The Health Minister’s decision to provide more eye lenses free of charge at state-run hospitals is commendable. His free-stent project has stood thousands of heart patients in good stead; some unscrupulous doctors and surgical device importers have been thriving on what may be called the lucrative stent trade. A wag says hardly anyone who visits a cardiologist returns home without a stent in his or her ticker. Minister Senaratne has also succeeded in persuading the government to remove the ceiling on financial allocations for treating cancer patients. These are, no doubt, meritorious deeds for which the ruling coalition should be thanked in spite of its many failings.

Government interventions to impose price ceilings for the sake of the public usually lead to artificial shortages of the goods concerned and the lowering of their quality. The mess the present administration has got into in trying to control rice prices may serve as an example.

The challenge before the Health Ministry is to ensure that reasonably priced eye lenses will be freely available and their quality will not suffer due to the slashing of their exorbitant prices. The most effective way of regulating the profit-hungry private importers hell bent on exploiting the hapless public is to strengthen the state sector as a formidable competitor. The government ought to develop state outfits such as the State Pharmaceutical Corporation and make the best use of them to bring relief to the public.

Ceylon Today Editorial

Trade, not ‘joy’ visits, crucial

15 February 2017

In this era of trade, when the head of a country visits a large economy, he's generally accompanied by a large trade delegation in attempts to further trade and investments.

But that doesn't appear to be so in respect of Premier Ranil Wickremesinghe's current visit to Australia. The delegates comprising this visit numbered a total of eight. Of those eight, one is the Premier's wife Maithiree and, among the balance seven are two ministers and one Deputy Minister (i.e., Ports Minister Arjuna Ranatunga, Minister of Irrigation and Water Resources Management Vijith Wijayamuni Zoysa and Deputy Foreign Minister Dr. Harsha de Silva), while the rest ostensibly comprise 'several personnel from the Premier's Office.

No mention is made of any members from the private sector accompanying Wickremesinghe on this visit.

Meanwhile, the New York based tradingeconomics website said that the value of Australia's economy in 2015 was US$ 1,339.54 billion and it was equivalent to 2.16% of the value of the global economy. (This newspaper was unable to immediately access information with regard to the size of Australia's economy at the end of last year).

In contrast, according to an Australian Government website, the size of Sri Lanka's economy was $ 82.5 billion last year. That means that the Aussie economy is more than 16 times, or, in other words, more than 1,500% larger than Sri Lanka's economy.
Also, the per capita income of an Australian in 2015 was $ 54,708.18, said tradingeconomics, whereas in the case of Sri Lanka, according to official Aussie data, it was a mere $ 3,869.8 as at last year. That means that an Aussie's per capita income is more than 14 times or more than 1,300% the size of Sri Lanka's per capita income.

Therefore, at least superficially, there lies a vast export market, 'down under' for Sri Lanka. Nonetheless, according to the Aussie Government, in the period 2015/16, Australia enjoyed a trade surplus over the island. Though exports from Sri Lanka to Australia grew by 18% Year on Year (YoY) to Australian (A)$ 226 million and imports from 'down under' fell by 14.8% to A$ 251 million, yet, the Aussies enjoyed a trade surplus of A$ 25 million over Sri Lanka. (According to the internet, one A$ was equivalent to $ 0.77 as at yesterday).

According to the Aussie Government, Sri Lanka's major sources of exports were tea & matè (A$37 million), 'other' textile clothing (A$30 million), textile clothing accessories (A$ 17 million) and 'fixed' vegetable oils & fats, 'hard' (A$ 17 million). Imports were led by vegetables,' fcf' (A$ 69 million), milk, cream, whey & yoghurt (A$ 42 million), wheat (A$ 28 million) and paper & paperboard (A$ 19 million), respectively.

According to World Integrated Trade Solutions (WITS), a statistical platform managed by the World Bank, the UN and the World Trade Organization, Australia's total imports in 2015 amounted to $ 200,114 million. Compare that with Sri Lanka's total annual import bill which is $ 20 billion, this means that Australia's total import bill is more than 10 times or more than 900% larger than the island's total import bill.

And not that Australia has a large population either. Its population is larger by a mere three million than that of Sri Lanka's. Whereas Sri Lanka's population last year was 21.2 million, according to the Census and Statistics Department, according to the Australian Bureau of Statistics, their population as at June of this year stood at 24.1 million. These show the massive consumption capacity of rich Australia, compared to that of poor Sri Lanka's.

According to the 'World's richest countries' website, Australia's imports last year were led by machinery ($ 27.3 billion or 14.4% of total imports), vehicles - $ 26.2 billion (13.9%), electronic equipment - $ 26.2 billion (10.6%), mineral fuels including oil - $ 17.6 billion (9.3%), medical testing equipment-$7.8 billion (4.1%), pharmaceuticals-$ 7.8 billion (4.1%), gems and precious metals - $ 7.6 billion (4%), plastics - $ 5.4 billion (2.8%), furniture, lighting and signs - $ 4.3 billion (2.3%) and iron or steel products - $ 4.1 billion (2.2%).

According to the same website, Australia's fastest growing exports were aircraft and spacecraft, up 631.4% (over 2012 figures) to $ 2.2 billion, tobacco, up 138.9% to $ 766.4 million, zinc, up 104% to $ 40.5 million, vegetable products, up 48.6% to $64 million, cereal and milk preparations up 34.6% to $ 1.2 billion, paper yarn and woven fabric up 26.4% to $ 18.1 million, other animal origin products up 26.2% to $ 75 million, dairy, eggs and honey, up 24.2% to $ 793.8 million, stone, plaster and cement, up 21% to $ 746 million, ceramic products, up 19.5% to $ 769.5 million, feathers, artificial flowers and hair, up 18.8% to $ 51.7 million, oil seed up 18.2% to $ 244.1 million, lead, up 17.6% to $ 10.5 million and glass up 16.7% to $ 763.9 million.

Therefore, it may be prudent, if the private sector, together with the government, would explore the possible strong points in the country's export basket that may be enlarged to accommodate the Australian market as well. A free trade agreement may be helpful in this regard.

Daily News Editorial

Ranjan’s ire justified

15 February 2017

Even his worst critic would concede that Deputy Minister Ranjan Ramanayake, like the many roles he has played in the celluloid world, is a staunch defender of the oppressed and a doughty fighter on the side of righteous causes. Above all he is a newsmaker and quite a favourite with certain TV channels. However he has taken exception to the coverage of one particular news channel which he alleges has cast him in poor light. Taking advantage of the recently enacted Right to Information Act, the movie star turned politician had availed himself of the opportunity to ferret out the criteria applied by the Media Ministry in handing out frequencies to TV channels.

Ramanayake contends that a certain TV channel was relentlessly targeting him and wants to know how this channel obtained the frequencies and under what criteria. He is particularly incensed by the fact that he has no opportunity to respond to the channel concerned. He says he has been a victim of this media channel for expressing his forthright views in parliament and being critical of the soil mining incident in Divulapititya “Unlike with the press in a similar case in which the affected party can go to the Press Complaints Commission for redress I find that there is no place to go when the matter is between a person and a TV channel”. Hence he has decided to explore the yardstick applied when issuing TV channel licensing and the frequency allocation procedure.

The Deputy Minister is not alone in his predicament. Certain TV channels have got into the business of deliberately targeting prominent government ministers. Minister Patali Champika Ranawaka is one such victim, although, unlike Ramanayake, he has chosen to keep his own counsel.

However, the most obnoxious attacks are being reserved for Prime Minister Ranil Wickremesinghe, who like Minister Ranawaka, continues to ignore the barbs hurled at him by a particular TV channel on a daily basis. This attack on the PM was not of recent origin. Special segments were reserved by this TV channel for attacks on Wickremesinghe from days he was Opposition Leader in his final stint. This channel today has descended to the level of even stage managing news conferences to get those hosting them to personally attack the integrity of the country’s Prime Minister. Presently it has seized upon the Central Bank bond issue to cast aspersions on the PM with interviews strategically arranged with persons known to have axes to grind with the Premier. Hardly a day passes without special interviews being hosted by personnel from this TV channel where “full tosses” are being bowled to those interviewed in order to cast the PM in poor light vis a vis the bond issue. There is also another channel where the host of a morning programme dealing with news in the press giving his own interpretations of the news stories which are brazenly anti government.

We are here in no way suggesting that TV channels and the Press go soft on government misdoings. On the contrary, all anti-people acts, waste and corruption in government should be exposed as a matter of duty. The Press has got to live up to the tag of being the watchdog of the nation. What is objectionable is targeting individuals against whom the particular media institution has an axe to grind. It is in this context that Ramanayake’s act of trying to unravel the criteria adopted in issuing TV licensing and frequencies should be viewed. The government has to think seriously if it is going to permit TV channels to target individuals in the government in the guise of relaying news and at least adopt some safeguards in this regard. Individuals so vilified should be given the opportunity to counter this malicious propaganda of the type that is being directed at the Prime Minister. As noted by Ramanayake, the victims should be provided a mechanism whereby the TV channels concerned are brought to account.

It goes without saying that the television medium is a powerful one that creates a lasting impact on the audiences. Negative views portrayed on the government and individuals via television therefore could make indelible impressions on the public. This is in no way suggesting that the TV channels sing hosannas to the government. Neither should they play favourites with certain politicians, like some channels do presently, while targeting others.

True, heavy competition sometimes make certain television channels go overboard in painting the government in negative light. This is because the public yearn to lap up news and information exposing government misdoings. Hence at times certain channels look overtly anti-government. However, there are also deliberate ploys adopted by certain news channels to paint the regime black. This may or may not be at the instance of the one time political bosses who ran these channels by remote control.

Be that as it may, the Right to Information Act appears to be having the desired impact, with the public now allowed to venture into realms which were hitherto no go zones. Hopefully others too will follow Ramanayake in unlocking doors that were shut from the public.