EU has shown the way
Coronavirus has provided parliaments, the world over, with an opportunity to be of some use to the people who have to stump up colossal amounts of funds to maintain them. The European Parliament has allowed one of its buildings, in Brussels, to be used to shelter about 100 homeless women, many of whom are said to be victims of domestic violence, during lockdowns. Offices in the building have been converted into bedrooms, and the women are provided with meals and medical care, we are told. (The solution to the problem, however, is to lock up the barbarians responsible for domestic violence so that their wives and children don’t have to run away.) Anyway, the EU Parliament should be praised for its consideration towards the hapless women, thrown on to the streets for no fault of theirs. Its example is worthy of emulation.
We also have a Parliament, where hardly anything useful gets done. It is almost empty when in session, and all its members gather only to pounce on one another. The Speaker has to close its public galleries for schoolchildren, more often than not, as MPs turn violent and trade raw filth and heavy blows. They see eye to eye only on the need to look after their perks and privileges. There are, of course, some good men and women, there, and the exception proves the rule.
The Opposition called for a special parliamentary debate on the Covid-19 situation, before the dissolution of Parliament, and we argued, in this space, that such debates were an absolute waste of time and public money. We said we thought Parliament might be able to serve some useful purpose as an isolation centre. What is reported from Brussels has bolstered our argument.
Thanks to the WHO-recommended physical distancing, and the cancellation of leave of all military personnel, camps now lack space; the army has had to use schools to shelter some of its men. Tourist hotels are also going to be used as quarantine centres, we are told. Why can’t the buildings, at the sprawling parliamentary complex, be used to quarantine people, or to accommodate the military personnel?
It may be recalled that the yahapalana government used a section of the Mattala airport as a paddy storage facility. Those who did so are now in the Opposition, and they won’t be able to protest, in the event of parliamentary buildings being used to quarantine suspected Covid-19 patients, or provide accommodation to the military personnel who are at the forefront of the country’s war on the virus.
After all, the former Opposition Leader, during his election campaign, last year, said he was ready to offer his services as a servant to the people in case of being elected President. Other ex-MPs also call themselves servants of the public. The Prime Minister says he is even ready to die for the people. So, there is no reason why the people, who have to undergo quarantine, or those who need shelter during the national health emergency, or the military personnel, should not be accommodated at the parliament complex. If the EU can do so, why can’t Sri Lanka?
Besides, there are nine Provincial Council complexes, which have remained closed for a long time. Thanks to the yahapalana government’s legislative skullduggery, which facilitated the smuggling of several sections into the Provincial Councils (Amendment) Bill, sans judicial sanction, at the committee stage, in 2017, the PC polls are not likely to be held in the foreseeable future. The PC buildings, constructed at a huge cost, can also be used as quarantine centres, or temporary military camps. The EU has shown the way.
Coronavirus has provided parliaments, the world over, with an opportunity to be of some use to the people who have to stump up colossal amounts of funds to maintain them. The European Parliament has allowed one of its buildings, in Brussels, to be used to shelter about 100 homeless women, many of whom are said to be victims of domestic violence, during lockdowns. Offices in the building have been converted into bedrooms, and the women are provided with meals and medical care, we are told. (The solution to the problem, however, is to lock up the barbarians responsible for domestic violence so that their wives and children don’t have to run away.) Anyway, the EU Parliament should be praised for its consideration towards the hapless women, thrown on to the streets for no fault of theirs. Its example is worthy of emulation.
We also have a Parliament, where hardly anything useful gets done. It is almost empty when in session, and all its members gather only to pounce on one another. The Speaker has to close its public galleries for schoolchildren, more often than not, as MPs turn violent and trade raw filth and heavy blows. They see eye to eye only on the need to look after their perks and privileges. There are, of course, some good men and women, there, and the exception proves the rule.
The Opposition called for a special parliamentary debate on the Covid-19 situation, before the dissolution of Parliament, and we argued, in this space, that such debates were an absolute waste of time and public money. We said we thought Parliament might be able to serve some useful purpose as an isolation centre. What is reported from Brussels has bolstered our argument.
Thanks to the WHO-recommended physical distancing, and the cancellation of leave of all military personnel, camps now lack space; the army has had to use schools to shelter some of its men. Tourist hotels are also going to be used as quarantine centres, we are told. Why can’t the buildings, at the sprawling parliamentary complex, be used to quarantine people, or to accommodate the military personnel?
It may be recalled that the yahapalana government used a section of the Mattala airport as a paddy storage facility. Those who did so are now in the Opposition, and they won’t be able to protest, in the event of parliamentary buildings being used to quarantine suspected Covid-19 patients, or provide accommodation to the military personnel who are at the forefront of the country’s war on the virus.
After all, the former Opposition Leader, during his election campaign, last year, said he was ready to offer his services as a servant to the people in case of being elected President. Other ex-MPs also call themselves servants of the public. The Prime Minister says he is even ready to die for the people. So, there is no reason why the people, who have to undergo quarantine, or those who need shelter during the national health emergency, or the military personnel, should not be accommodated at the parliament complex. If the EU can do so, why can’t Sri Lanka?
Besides, there are nine Provincial Council complexes, which have remained closed for a long time. Thanks to the yahapalana government’s legislative skullduggery, which facilitated the smuggling of several sections into the Provincial Councils (Amendment) Bill, sans judicial sanction, at the committee stage, in 2017, the PC polls are not likely to be held in the foreseeable future. The PC buildings, constructed at a huge cost, can also be used as quarantine centres, or temporary military camps. The EU has shown the way.