Thursday, April 6, 2017

Ceylon Today Editorial

Balancing democracy with stability

07 April 2017

Sri Lanka's move towards full democracy, post 8 January, 2015 is astonishing.

The only country in the Asian region which may be ahead of it on this score may be Japan.

Ironically, in the immediate aftermath of World War II in 1945, it was war destroyed Japan, destroyed first by Colonel Dolittle of the US Air Force's (USAF's) illegal incendiary bombing of Tokyo, followed by the even greater inhumane destruction by the atom bombs dropped over Hiroshima and Nagasaki by the USAF in August 1945, was yet, the richest country in Asia in 1948, the year Sri Lanka got its independence, with the island ending up in second place to Japan, then.

Sixty-nine years down the line to the present, economically, i.e. from a GDP perspective, Japan may be the second richest country in Asia after China and Sri Lanka, now way behind, but, in terms of 'democracy indicators', it may not be wrong to say that while Japan may be the first, Sri Lanka may now be in second place.

Sri Lanka's move towards greater democracy, post 8 January 2015, may even be the envy of the West, with perhaps only the rich Nordic/Scandinavian countries from that region, being ahead of it on this indicator, especially in the backdrop that this poor, developing island was scarred for 26 long years by brutal, Tamil terrorism, which only ended as recently as eight years ago, in 2009.

And, in a further step towards moving towards full democracy, Cabinet Spokesman and Health Minister Rajitha Senaratne told reporters on Wednesday that Cabinet has approved amendments to the Witness Protection Act, allowing witnesses to provide evidence from abroad in the form of audio-visual communication. (See this newspaper's yesterday's edition)

Nonetheless, even after all these laudable steps that the new Government of Sri Lanka (GoSL) is taking to strengthen and firm up democracy after its systems were battered and bruised by 26 years of Tamil terrorism, made worse by the misuse and abuse of power by the previous Mahinda Rajapaksa regime which made terrorism even after its destruction in 2009, an excuse to unleash State terror on its people, by throwing-up pet Stalinist, Nazi and Maoist slogans such as imperialism, Western agents, saboteurs and traitors to serve their own vested interests. GoSL, however, must be mindful that democracy alone cannot feed its people, find jobs for the unemployed, in short, give a better life to its citizens.

Stability, both in its political and social form, hand in hand with democracy, is also needed to ensure a better life and higher living standards for the people of this country. Good examples of these are the South-East and East Asian tiger economies.

Some of those economies, at least previously operating under the umbrella of dictatorships where human rights were relegated to the dustbin, nevertheless ensured a better economic life for its people were obtained, after which only they embraced democracy.

Examples of these are South Korea and Taiwan, while the other tiger economies such as Malaysia, Singapore, Thailand, even now, may have only pretensions of democracy, if they have such pretensions at all, while Hong Kong has ended up as being a colony of China, which, however, has no pretensions of democracy!

Even, the emerging Tiger economy Vietnam, like China, also has no pretensions to democracy, being governed under the Marxist-Communist doctrine of a one-party State, ipso facto from a political perspective, though in an economic sense, like China, it practises capitalism, thereby allowing it to give a better life and higher living standards to its people, democracy or no democracy.

Further, those tiger economies have not become victims of 'Arab Spring', like Tunisia and Libya, or 'more' tragically, like Syria and to a lesser extent Egypt.

That may be due to the 'theory of relativity', not in the physical sense as applied by Einstein, but in the socio-economic and political sense where those South-East and East Asian economies may not be as bad as the Arab Spring countries vis-à-vis negative indicators such as corruption, nepotism and the breakdown in the rule of law.

Japan, post World War II, was however a totally different kettle of fish. Its goods enjoyed free trade access to the world's largest economy, the USA, thereby helping it to grow and become an economic giant.

In the pursuit of greater freedom for its people, of establishing justice and the rule of law with retrospective effect and beyond, hand in hand in achieving and reaching forth to these noble ideals, GoSL must also be mindful of the need to firm up political, social and economic stability in the country.

The Tass correspondent of the then Soviet Union in Colombo, speaking to a local journalist in the 1960 said, what's the point in speaking about democracy when your people are hungry?

His words proved to be prophetic, when a few years later the country was engulfed in the April 1971 insurgency, which, in its aftermath, left 13,000 youth, belonging to the then 77% Sinhala majority community dead in the hands of the authorities within a matter of a few weeks after the launch of this abortive uprising.

Daily News Editorial

Fresh start for BIA

07 April 2017

Today, the newly renovated sole runway of the Bandaranaike International Airport (BIA, IATA Code CMB) will be back in business, with the landing of an all-new SriLankan Airlines Airbus A320 New Engine Option (neo) aircraft. The airport was on the verge of being blacklisted as the last resurfacing was completed in 1986.

The US$ 50 million renovation was an integrated project that included the installation of a new energy-saving LED lighting system for aircraft guidance. The runway will be in a good condition for at least another 20 years or 200,000 aircraft movements. Another significant feature was the widening of the runway from 60 metres to 75 metres, which will facilitate landings and take offs by Airbus A380 aircraft. However, boarding will still have to be by mobile staircase as the terminal aerobridges are still not compatible with the A380. That facility will be available after the next expansion of the airport which is slated to begin this year itself.

Future projects include eight more passenger gates, a domestic terminal, a five-storey car-park, and star class hotels neighbouring the airport for which the Government has already sought proposals. A new split-level passenger terminal building, which separates arrivals and departures vertically, a new pier with eight boarding gates, and 14 passenger boarding bridges, with a dedicated gate comprising two passenger boarding bridges for the new Airbus A380, will be included in the proposed new complex. The project is likely to include enhanced transport options to and from the airport.

When the entire project is completed by around 2020, Colombo will be one of the best airports in the region capable of handling around 15 million passengers a year. It is also time to think about a second runway for the BIA, which can get very busy during certain times of the day.

In an encouraging sign for the virtually brand new airport, several new airlines will be flying to Colombo soon. One of the first will be Silk Air, a subsidiary of Singapore Airlines. We are told that several more airlines are waiting in the wings to fly to Colombo.

The tourism and business community in Sri Lanka has strongly advocated an Open Skies policy which will see at least 60 more aircraft movements per day. This will make more inbound seats available for Colombo, which will be a boon for tourism. Actually, the dearth of airline seats into Colombo has been a bane for Sri Lanka’s tourism industry. One way of addressing this problem, apart from Open Skies, is granting more Fifth Freedom rights (the right given to a third country airline to transport fee-paying passengers to another third country – one good example is the daily Emirates flight to Singapore from Colombo) to foreign airlines. More attractive landing and fuel fees may also induce more airlines to enter Colombo.

This raises the question whether we are actually promoting the BIA among foreign airlines. (This should not be confused with promoting the country as a tourist destination). Most airports around the world have Route Development Officers who scour opportunities for promoting their airports and suggest new city pairs to foreign airlines seeking expansion. As far as we know, Colombo does not have such an officer. His or her duty is to proactively market the airport and its advantages, bringing in foreign airline representatives and attending web-based and physical “Route Shops” and aviation fairs held around the world.

Colombo has the potential to become a bigger regional aviation hub, but we should be more proactive. The BIA, possibly in conjunction with SriLankan and our missions abroad, must seek direct connections to more destinations especially in Europe, Australia and Africa. SriLankan’s pullout from Paris and Frankfurt has created a lacuna vis-à-vis Europe and the BIA should approach established and new European airlines to fill that void. With SriLankan deciding to fly to Australia (Melbourne) from the latter part of the year, Africa should be next. For example, rapidly expanding airlines such as Ethiopian would see potential in a routing such as Addis Ababa-Colombo-Male-Addis Ababa. Colombo should also concentrate on getting more Low Cost Carriers (LCCs).

The partial closure of the BIA also saw an increased demand for the old Colombo Airport in Ratmalana (IATA Code RML) and the Hambantota Rajapaksa International Airport (IATA Code HRI). This is a positive sign. The authorities must now keep up this momentum, perhaps by diverting some of the business jet and regional commercial traffic to Ratmalana. The Government should seriously explore the possibility of expanding the Ratmalana runway to accommodate bigger passenger planes since many other cities have more than one international airport. The Government will also have to address some of the shortcomings at HRI, such as the lack of a proper taxiway and the wrong runway orientation, to attract airlines. Jaffna or Trincomalee would also be ideal as international gateways.

Sri Lanka is in an ideal geographical position to exploit the airlines’ thirst for new routes especially in the Asia Pacific region. The BIA’s new look will be the ideal take-off point for this venture.

The Island Editorial

Cutting the Gordian knot


The Bar Association of Sri Lanka (BASL) has sought to wash its hands of the so-called Kannan issue. It has said it had nothing to do with the appointment of Ramanathan Kannan, a member of the unofficial bar, a High Court (HC) judge and, therefore, it will not get involved in the ongoing campaign in some quarters to remove him. Trouble began when President Maithripala Sirisena, in his wisdom, made the controversial appointment on the then BASL chief’s recommendations a few weeks ago. The President insists that he followed proper procedure in making the appointment, which the Judicial Service Association (JSA) has taken exception to on the grounds that it was made at the expense of a number of deserving District Court judges. The BASL has said its former head wrote to the President recommending Kannan without the knowledge of its decision-making body.

Vavuniya District Court Judge D. L. A. Manaf has been appointed a High Court judge amidst the Kannan controversy and the situation has since taken a turn for the worse. The Kannan issue has, we believe, got overpoliticised; the opponents of the yahapalana government are flogging it hard to gain political mileage and using it as a bludgeon to beat President Sirisena with.

Interestingly, it may be recalled that President Sirisena, who has not heeded calls for removing Kannan from his post, lost no time in ‘vapourising’, so to speak, Chief Justice Mohan Peiris, who had succeeded Dr. Shirani Bandaranayake, who was wrongfully impeached. The government claimed the President had acted on the advice of the BASL, whose top guns threw their weight behind the UNP-led Opposition at the last presidential and parliamentary elections in 2015. Ironically, the BASL now tells us that it does not want to be party to the ongoing campaign for removing Judge Kannan because it had nothing to do with his appointment!

As for the removal of CJ Peiris, President Sirisena’s contention was that the post of the CJ had never fallen vacant because CJ Bandaranayake was removed wrongfully. He waved his executive wand and Peiris was gone! (Some of the yahapalana activists who advocate non-violence unflinchingly resorted to threats in a bid to force CJ Peiris to resign! Their political masters couldn’t have been unaware of their strong-arm tactics.) In trying to rectify one wrong, President Sirisena committed another. He should have reversed the seriously flawed process of Bandaranayake’s impeachment through Parliament itself the way the 18th Amendment was done away with.

Now, as regards the Kannan issue, the buck is reported to have been passed to the Judicial Service Commission (JSC). Legal experts argue that a High Court judge can be removed only on disciplinary grounds. President Sirisena has, true to form, let the grass grow under his feet. It is unfair to expect the JSC to cut the Gordian knot. Had the President acted responsibly, this situation would not have arisen.

Judge Kannan has made the same mistake as Peiris; in spite of being very senior lawyers, both of them got into trouble as they reposed their trust in executive presidents. The late President J. R. Jayewardene boasted that the only feat he could not achieve with his executive powers was to make a man a woman and vice versa. So, President Mahinda Rajapaksa and his successor may have thought they should at least be able to make lawyers judges with the help of powers vested in them.

Peiris and Kannan should have known better than to have themselves appointed judges by politicians. We pointed out in this space in the aftermath of the removal of CJ Peiris that he should not have remained in his post until he was removed. Whether Kannan will do what Peiris was not wise enough to do remains to be seen.

What needs to be borne in mind is that Kannan is now a sitting judge and the manner in which the issue of his appointment is handled will have an impact on the judiciary. It behoves politicians to act with restraint without aggravating an already bad situation.