Don’t arm MPs!
Thursday 29th October 2015
Some people have all the luck. They are our
parliamentarians. They live off the fat of the land at the expense of the
taxpaying public though most of them lack even basic educational qualifications
to be employed in the public sector as sanitary workers. Monday’s article on
this page revealed that, in an Indian state, 255 PhD holders had been vying
with 2.3 mn job seekers including 152,000 graduates for securing state employment
as peons. But, those who have even failed GCE O/L go places as ministers in
this country!
Besides their salaries, pensions, duty free
vehicles and other perks, parliamentarians are given personal weapons. About 30
first-time MPs in the present Parliament have asked for pistols, of all things,
as we reported yesterday. Others already have personal weapons. MPs have been
provided with small firearms all these years and the tradition continues even
under the ‘yahapalana’ government.
Instead of asking for personal weapons, the
lawmakers ought to take the lead in ridding the country of criminal elements
harming hapless citizens so that everybody will be safe. If the vulnerable
sections of society can live without weapons in spite of the rising crime rate
why can’t their representatives?
More than six years have elapsed since the
conclusion of the war. High security zones are being dismantled and checkpoints
in the former conflict zone done away with. The government tells us that
security threats are a thing of the past and those who successfully neutralised
terrorism should stop harping on their military achievements. But, politicians
still have large security contingents at their disposal. Armed escorts
providing VIP security continue to wreak havoc on public roads much to the
consternation of other road users.
Some Marxists who opposed the country’s war on
terror, calling for negotiations with Prabhakaran, had no qualms about
obtaining firearms from the capitalist JRJ/Premadasa governments and going on a
killing spree against the JVP in the late 1980s. And, worse, most of those
weapons were never returned. Successive governments haven’t cared to recover
the thousands of lethal firearms issued to political parties.
Records pertaining to the arms distribution during
the JVP’s reign of terror must be available with the defence authorities. A
high level probe has been launched into a floating armoury belonging to a
private security firm. It behoves the government to make a similar effort as
regards the missing weapons. It should appoint a probe committee and do
everything in its power to ensure that each and every firearm so issued is
returned. It is believed that most of those weapons have found their way into
the underworld.
Only the police, the security forces, members of
the Civil Defence Force and other authorised personnel engaged in security
related fields should be allowed to carry arms. The issuance of firearms to MPs
or other people’s representatives can’t be justified on any grounds. Parliamentarians
have armed policemen providing security to them round the clock and it defies
comprehension why they should be armed. If they want to have personal weapons
they should be stripped of police protection and asked to look after their own
security.
What the Indian Supreme Court told the politicians
in that country in 2008 comes to mind. The apex court known for being fiercely
independent minced no words when it said that if politicians thought they were
so threatened as to be protected by huge security contingents they had better
stay at home, without being a nuisance to the public. The practice of MPs being
given firearms must be discontinued urgently.
A monkey with a straight razor is, in our book,
less dangerous than a politician with a lethal weapon.
No comments:
Post a Comment