Undoing the budget
Sunday 29th November 2015
Nobody would have been surprised at yesterday’s
news that the Sri Lanka Administrative Service (SLAS) Association has protested
about the car permits for qualified public servants being withdrawn. Nobody
likes losing privileges they enjoy and some noises about possible strike action
(they’ve called it "severe trade union action") against the budget
announcement have already been made. MPs who will also lose the privilege have
so far said nothing. We don’t know if those elected for the first time last
August have already cashed that particular cheque and got their duty free
vehicles, or at least set the ball rolling (or wheels turning), to get it. If
that was so, the early birds are certainly not going to lose the worm. After
all they are MPs aren’t they and their privileges are customarily enhanced and
not diminished as the public is too well aware. It won’t be long before
non-SLAS categories like doctors, engineers, university dons etc. mount the
bandwagon. There’s more than a sporting chance that the government would
relent.
It looks as though Minister Ravi Karunanayake’s
Budget 2016 is already being undone. Yesterday’s The Island reported that Prime
Minister Ranil Wickremesinghe had said that Parliament will have to decide
whether a special tax be imposed to pay for some ongoing projects that had been
launched without allocating sufficient funds to pay for them. There was no
mention of any of that in the budget speech and the people are not likely to
take kindly to new burdens being heaped on their backs. The previous regime
certainly splurged wildly on least essentials. Remember what was spent trying
to get the Commonwealth Games here? Thank goodness it went to Australia. We are
now told that the construction of four new buildings at Temple Trees had
commenced under the old order with no funds allocated and the contractors are
yet to be paid. Work on one five- storey building has been stopped while
another under construction would be done at Bentota instead, the premier said.
Hopefully the expenditure already incurred at Kollupitiya is minimal. Those who
have been to the prime minister’s official residence in recent years,
appropriated by President Mahinda Rajapaksa for himself during his regime, have
seen the kind of extravagances that have been lavished there under pretexts
such as the Commonwealth Head of Governments meeting hosted here. Facilities
provided were brazenly used for political purposes to perpetuate the Rajapaksa
raj.
The budget proposals of removing the expensive
fertilizer subsidy and paying paddy farmers a cash grant of Rs. 25,000 per
hectare of cultivation in lieu has triggered angry protests. It is unlikely
that this budget proposal, at least in its present form, will see the light of
day. There is no doubt that the previous subsidy arrangement was not
leak-proof. Equally, what guarantee is there that farmers will use a cash
subsidy to buy fertilizer for their fields rather than spend it on everyday
consumption? Meeting the cost of living is an eternal struggle for the poor –
and peasant farmers certainly belong to that category – so the temptation to
spend now and worry about a reduced harvest from an unfertilized field later will
be immense. It has already been announced that the vehicle emission tax will
not be imposed on three-wheelers and motor bikes; and rightly so. Now they are
talking of a ‘congestion’ charge. Chances are that the number of registered
vehicles on the books was multiplied by the 5,000-rupee tax charge and the
result included in the budget revenue figures. All this will need adjustment of
the numbers.
We commended in this space the withdrawal of the
special car permit scheme in our first post-budget comment. It was doubly
sensible in that the facility was taken away from MPs too. Most readers,
certainly of the older generation, would have heard Sir. John Kotelawela’s
celebrated remark, henda athey thiyanakang beda ganilla – serve yourself as
long as the ladle is in your hand. That certainly is what has long been
happening where the political and to some extent the administrative class in
this country has been concerned with regard to many matters including car
permits. The prohibitive duties long imposed on the import of vehicles
certainly made a duty free permit to import a car a valuable privilege. We
wouldn’t grudge it to many of those who have got it if they use their private
vehicles, imported duty free, for their official work, perhaps charging a reasonable
mileage rate. But no, they keep their private cars garaged at home for the wife
to go marketing and drop the children off at school and all official and many
private errands are run in the official vehicle. The perk includes an official
driver courtesy the taxpayer. Then these permits are renewed every five years
so it’s a recurring privilege.
Time was when the government gave certain
categories of public servants car loans to buy private vehicles. They were
required to use such vehicles for official work for which a mileage rate was
paid. Old timers used to say that the mileage claim sufficed to pay the loan
installments. Those were spacious days when a public service salary went a long
way and enabled reasonably comfortable living. An MP was paid an allowance of
Rs. 750 a month and there were no pensions after five years service and other
lavish perks of the present. The beneficiaries of the car permits are allowed
to sell them today. They used to in the past too resorting to what was called
an ‘open papers’ ruse where the seller provided a signed transfer document
which the buyer did not register at the motor traffic department until the
period of prohibition of sale was over. MPs are given up to a USD 50,000 loan
facility or Rs. 5.8 million from any bank to open a letter of credit for a car
import. The engine capacity of vehicles permitted to be imported duty free was
also raised enabling expensive high-end vehicles to come in. All these made the
car permits very valuable indeed. No wonder then that every possible effort is
being made to keep their issue intact.
If the government is going to backtrack from its
announced intentions, let it also restore the abolished income taxpayer
privilege of a car permit. Under this, person who had paid over half a million
rupees income tax per year over a five-year period became entitled to a permit
enabling a partial duty waiver on the import of a car. These permits too were
sold and car importers knew exactly how to do this business in the same way
that private hospitals know how to handle getting assistance from the
President’s Fund for patients needing by-pass surgery!
No comments:
Post a Comment