Blues of the Blues
02 September 2016
The SLFP is celebrating its 65th anniversary while being in the
throes of a deepening crisis. Its leaders are busy papering over the
cracks. All its woes, in our book, boil down to longstanding, mutual
hostility between President Maithripala Sirisena and the Rajapaksas. It
is in the current predicament, struggling to avoid a debilitating
break-up because President Mahinda Rajapaksa, during his second term,
prevented Minister Maithripala Sirisena achieving his prime ministerial
dream and the latter after becoming President ruined Rajapaksa’s
chances of becoming PM.
When Prime Minister D. M.
Jayaratne took seriously ill in the heyday of the Rajapaksa government,
we argued in this space that the prime ministerial ambitions of
several SLFP heavyweights were bound to threaten the party’s unity
sooner or later. Sirisena, who fell from grace and was short-changed by
the Rajapaksas, voted with his feet when the last presidential
election was called.
The Sirisena faction of the SLFP blames
Rajapaksa for two electoral defeats the party suffered last year.
While its argument holds water to some extent it is also true that
Sirisena was instrumental in bringing about those two crushing defeats
which debilitated the SLFP and reinvigorated the UNP. He joined forces
with the UNP, the TNA etc to defeat the SLFP’s presidential candidate
Rajapaksa in January last year. He arbitrarily brought down the SLFP-led
government by appointing UNP Leader Ranil Wickremesinghe
Prime Minister though the latter had only 46 seats in Parliament as
opposed to the SLFP’s 126. (The SLFP-led UPFA had about 150 seats!)
Thereafter, he unflinchingly engineered the defeat of the SLFP at the
last general election by queering the party’s prime ministerial
candidate, Rajapaksa’s pitch. He also, through political manoeuvring,
deprived the SLFP-led UPFA of the post of the Opposition Leader so as to
reduce his bête noire, Rajapaksa, to an ordinary MP. Thus, Sirisena
has settled political scores with his erstwhile boss and the former
ruling clan and achieved his goal at the expense of the SLFP, which he
now leads and tries to steer to victory at future elections!
The
blame for the sorry state of affairs in the SLFP should be apportioned
to the Rajapaksas. Members of the party’s old guard grew resentful
that newcomers, mostly UNP defectors, were given top ministerial posts
besides special treatment. The Rajapaksas were accused of running the
party as well as the government like a family business. They apparently
cherished the delusion that the people had given them a mandate to do
as they pleased because they had rid the country of terrorism. Their
loyalists flouted the law with impunity and most of them became a
public nuisance. Corruption became rampant and the rule of law suffered
a severe beating. The Republic of Sri Lanka was on the verge of
becoming a monarchy, for all practical purposes, towards the end of the
Rajapaksa rule.
It is being argued in some quarters that
Sirisena became the SLFP leader because the party constitution
stipulates that the SLFPer who secures the executive presidency becomes
the party leader. This argument is untenable in that Sirisena was not
the SLFP presidential candidate. He contested on the New Democratic
Front ticket while the SLFP fielded Rajapaksa. His appointment as the
SLFP leader has created a bad precedent; any SLFPer is now free to
leave the party in a huff, achieve his or her political goal with the
help of political forces, both internal and external, hostile to the
party and return to the party’s fold and, if possible, even secure its
leadership. President Sirisena and his loyalists have no moral right to
threaten disciplinary action against the SLFP dissidents for
disobeying the dictates of the party leadership.
The next
presidential election is likely to be a three-cornered contest with the
main candidates representing the SLFP, the UNP and the political
movement led by the Joint Opposition. Even though President Sirisena
has publicly declared he will not seek another term, those who threw in
their lot with him at the last presidential election are dependent on
him for their political survival. They are sure to pressure him to
change his mind. As for its presidential candidate, the UNP will be
without an alternative to Prime Minister Wickremesinghe, who has
consolidated his power in the party and neutralised those who strove
for his ouster. Whom will the SLFP dissidents field at the next
presidential polls in case of having to form a new party? The government
seems to think it is former Defence Secretary Gotabhaya Rajapaksa if
the selective efficiency on the part of some state outfits which have
sprung into action against him is anything to go by.
The
architects of the Jan. 08, 2015 regime change succeeded in cutting the
SLFP in two in the same way as Zeus is said to have halved man to
diminish the latter’s strength and turbulence. Now, the seemingly
Sisyphean task President Sirisena is saddled with is to bring the two
halves of the party together.
No comments:
Post a Comment