Forgotten body parts
07 September 2016
Pirates and buccaneering politicians have many things in common.
The former plunder sailing vessels and the latter the ship of state.
Besides, they believe that ‘dead men tell no tales’ and resort to
violence to neutralise enemies, both real and perceived.
But,
as for the murder of ruggerite, Wasim Thajudeen, one may doubt the
validity of the aforesaid saying, the origin of which is usually traced
to pirates. The story of his tragic end has now become known to one and
all.
There is one thing Sri Lankan politicians do properly
when they are ensconced in power; they cover their tracks effectively
after committing various crimes. That was why nobody got caught
following the change of government in 1994 though many grandees of the
previous regime had carried out numerous killings and robbed the state
coffers for 17 years. A similar situation has occurred following the
Jan. 08 2015 regime change. Those responsible for killings and amassing
ill-gotten wealth have not been brought to justice yet. This may be
the reason why those investigating the Thajudeen’s death are also going
around in circles.
The present government would not have
cared two hoots about the famous ruggerite’s murder if the suspects had
been within its ranks or they hadn’t been its political rivals. What
may be termed as ‘cadaver politics’ or the use of corpses to gain
political mileage, however, is not of recent origin. There have been
many instances thereof during the past several decades.
The
UNP once shed copious tears for Premawathie Manamperi of Kataragama and
other youth killed during the first JVP insurrection in 1971 and the
SLFP politicians dug up the Suriyakanda mass grave containing the
remains of a group of students killed in the late 1980s, when the JVP
took up arms again. The TNA is doing likewise, using as it does the war
dead to achieve its political end though it did not make a whimper of
protest when the LTTE went on killing sprees.
Whatever the
government’s real motive is as regards Thajudeen’s death, somebody has
to pay for that crime. Let that be the bottom line.
Meanwhile,
the Thajudeen killing and allied matters have given rise to an
interesting legal argument as we heard on Monday, when retired Judicial
Medical Officer Prof. Ananda Samarasekera’s anticipatory bail
application was taken up by the Colombo Magistrate’s Court. Senior State
Counsel, objecting to the doctor’s request, maintained that the body
parts under investigation and review by the court could be categorised
as public property and bail refused under the Public Property Act,
which the present government invokes liberally to ensure that its
rivals are remanded indefinitely.
We don’t intend to examine
the state counsel’s argument, which was challenged by the bail
applicant’s lawyer. That, we believe, is best left to the learned
Magistrate. Instead, we wonder why no governments cared to conduct
investigations when public roads used to be strewn with body parts, and
categorise them as public property by causing them to be under review
by courts so as to arrest and remand the perpetrators of mindless
violence. They conducted only a few probes very selectively for
political reasons. An all-out attempt to do so was conspicuous by its
absence even in situations where investigations were possible. Instead,
the body parts were given mass burials and the victims forgotten.
Their killers went scot free.
Those who caused roads and
waterways to turn red with blood through either terrorism or counter
terror in the southern parts of the country are currently cohabiting
for all practical purposes. Surprisingly, not even UN Chief Ban
Ki-moon, who was here recently to renew his call for a probe into the
war-related accountability issues, made any mention of the body parts
churned out by terrorist groups and state agents outside the war zone.
Who will mourn for those victims and call for justice?
No comments:
Post a Comment