Of that Chinaman
08 November 2016
Chinese Ambassador in Colombo Yi Xianliang threw cautious diplomacy
to the wind last week when he, addressing the media, countered a
well-publicised allegation that his country had provided loans to Sri
Lanka at extremely high interest rates. He may not have taken up that
issue without the blessings of Beijing. Having defended his country
passionately he bowled a Chinaman, which hit the government’s middle
stump, so to speak; he rhetorically asked why Colombo should ask for
Chinese loans if they were so expensive! Finance Minister Ravi
Karunanayake sought to pooh-pooh the Chinese envoy’s contention the
other day; it was all rhetoric and he did not sound convincing at all.
Some
government worthies have taken umbrage at the Chinese ambassador’s
comments. They are reported to have demanded that the Foreign Ministry
summon him forthwith. Their contention is that he should have taken up
those issues with the government without going public. But, Xianliang,
being a keen Sri Lanka watcher, may have thought that since the
Sirisena-Wickremesinghe government did not utter a word in protest when
its western counterparts overstepped their diplomatic limits to
comment on human rights situation here and accountability issues he
should be able to defend his country vis-à-vis serious allegations. He,
unlike other diplomats, confined his comments to the Chinese loans Sri
Lanka had drawn and other such matters concerning the two countries.
Therefore. before summoning him to the Foreign Ministry let the
government be urged to tell the public whether it has asked for or
already obtained Chinese loans at the same interest rates as the
Rajapaksa administration. Has it drawn loans from non-Chinese sources
at higher interest rates as claimed in some quarters? How much has it
got from the countries which were supportive of the 2015 regime change
and are full of praise for its leaders?
Some of those
currently in power were members of the JRJ regime when the late Indian
High Commissioner J. N. Dixit rode roughshod over the Old Fox and
blatantly interfered in Sri Lanka’s internal affairs. He enjoyed
unbridled freedom to act like a viceroy and was instrumental in foisting
the 13th Amendment on this country, having gone so far as to defend
the LTTE and facilitate the rescue of Prabhakaran in 1987. Even today
some western diplomats are critical of Sri Lanka’s human rights
situation etc. None of the ruling party grandees take exception to
their remarks which are oftentimes snide.
Far be it from us
to tell the government whether to summon the Chinese envoy or not. But,
if it does, it ought to mete out the same treatment to all diplomats
who comment on internal affairs of this country. The ambassador of a
friendly nation which has always stood by this country should not be
singled out for bashing.
The government which goes out of
its way to appease some foreign powers had better desist from
antagonising this country’s traditional allies. It should not repeat
the blunders the UNP-led UNF administration made way back in the early
2000s. Hard pressed for cash, that regime naively pinned its hopes on a
collective of countries –the US, the EU, Norway and Japan—which banded
together as the Tokyo Co-Chairs to control the then ‘peace process’ by
offering a USD 4.5 bn aid package, which was tied to progress to be
made in talks between the government and the LTTE. The UNF
administration compromised national security, appeased the LTTE and
reduced itself to a slave of the western bloc in the hope that it would
be given enough aid to tide it over. It waited for Godot!
The
UNF government blundered on military, economic and political fronts
and, as a result, lost elections for 11 years consecutively thereafter
until 2015. The current administration, too, won’t get anything tangible
by way of aid from its western masters and, therefore. should be wary
of antagonising China.
The Sirisena-Wickremesinghe
government had better stop harassing China, which deserves to be
treated with respect as a longstanding, trustworthy friend of Sri
Lanka.
No comments:
Post a Comment