Bond scam – doubts that will not down
29 January 2017
While nobody would have been surprised by the Nugegoda turnout on
Friday, very large numbers of ordinary people were inconvenienced by the
rally’s disruptive effects on traffic movement and the deafening sound
of firecrackers. Those who owe allegiance to the former president and
the Joint Opposition would no doubt exult at the crowd their organizers
were able to attract/bus-in to the rally. Equally certainly there
would have been at least a few butterflies in the tummies of those who
draw patronage and sustenance from the current administration and its
leaders. Rallies such as Friday’s provide entertainment and nourish the
thinking (apart from the egos of the organizers) of those suffering
the travails of making ends meet in the face of an ever increasing cost
of living. Most people tend to lay their grievances at the door of the
government, whoever is in power. Whether those gridlocked in traffic or
waiting interminably for a bus would nonetheless cheer the performance
of the rally organizers must necessarily be an open question.
That
said, thinking people must heave a sigh of relief that the cost of
this rally did not come out of their pockets. Reports of the various
ongoing investigations, whether cast iron proof necessary in a court of
law for conviction is found or not, indicate that state resources were
freely used to secure former President Mahinda Rajapaksa’s re-election.
Those responsible for that, cocksure that their candidate would romp
home comfortably, did not dream that they would be called to account.
Hopefully they will be made to pay for their sins but it’ll be months
and years before we learn how that papadam will crumble. It is hard, if
not impossible, to refute the Churchillian dictum that "democracy is
the worst form of government except for all those other forms that have
been tried out from time to time." Voters know that they can vote out
those they elected when the next election comes around. But that is
some years down the road as electors in Sri Lanka are painfully aware.
Apart from the long-postponed local elections, we have had the
experience of Prime Minister Sirima Bandaranaike extending her 1970
government by two years (to compensate for time lost by the JVP’s 1971
insurrection, she said) and JRJ’s infamous referendum that enabled him
to retain his five sixths majority of 1977 for six more years. How the
‘lamp’ won that referendum signifying the people’s consent for "rolling
up the electoral map" (if we may borrow the then president’s language)
is another story.
President Mahinda Rajapaksa is making no
bones about his intention of toppling the present government sooner
than later. This statement of intent drew raucous cheers when it was
re-stated on Friday. While a general election is some years away
according to the prevailing Constitution, with the president’s hands
tied on dissolving parliament until four years pass since the last
poll, there are other ways of obtaining desired objectives. Elections
are not the only means of toppling governments. Engineering defections
is one method, declaring trade union war is another. Let us not forget
that Mahinda Rajapaksa got the two thirds parliamentary majority by
which he, among other things, abolished the two-term limit on the
presidency (and cooked his goose two years earlier than he might have)
thanks to defections. While the Constitution has provisions to deprive
defectors of their seats, most of them have sat tight due to jilmaats
of one kind or another. Whether the present government will have a go
at pulling the carpet from under the feet of Ven. Athureliye Ratana who
came to this Parliament on the UNP National List courtesy the JHU only
time will tell.
The so-called bond scam debate in
parliament last week, the incessant statements pouring in that regard,
the president’s statement (or boast?) that it was he and no other who
replaced Mr. Arjuna Mahendran as Governor of the Central Bank with Dr.
Indrajit Coomaraswamy, the appointment of a three-member Presidential
Commission to probe the bond matter and the general certainty in the
country that a lot of things are badly wrong in the whole business
which hangs like an albatross round the prime minister’s neck. The mere
fact that the matter is being investigated, with the COPE report
referred to the Attorney General and the CID is also making its own
inquires, will not take the subject off the public agenda. Nobody will
be able to wish it away. The mega bucks earned by Perpetual, the
conflict of interest of the son-in-law of the Governor being a primary
dealer and a whole host of other matters including EPF bond purchases
from the secondary market have created doubts that will not down. There
was no vote at the end of last week’s parliamentary debate. The
president has laid down a three-month time frame for the commission to
complete its work although one of his ministers has already indicated
that a short extension is possible. Hopefully the trained legal minds
of two serving Supreme Court judges and the experience of a retired
Deputy Auditor General will be able to get to the bottom on that
matter. But whether their determination will satisfy the hawks –
political, public interest and dirt-seeking – is another matter.
Meanwhile
we can expect the Joint Opposition to ratchet up their campaign
seeking to topple the government. Whether this will include strategies
to win over Sirisena loyalists in the SLFP or even UNPers looking for
dividends in the event of a change in the power structure remains to be
seen. What the average Lankan with national welfare at heart will wish
most is that the jostling for power will not cost the country or its
people who are getting increasingly cynical about their rulers of all
political complexions. Instability is always expensive.
No comments:
Post a Comment