Burning down a parliament
03 April 2017
Guy Fawkes must be spinning, nay doing backflips, in his grave. He
made an abortive attempt to destroy the Parliament of England in 1605.
He got hanged and quartered, and his body parts were dispatched to the
four corners of the kingdom for his role in the Gunpowder Plot as a
warning to others of his ilk. A little over four centuries on,
Paraguayans have emulated him successfully albeit without gunpowder and
a religious agenda; they set their parliament on fire the other day to
‘save democracy’!
What provoked Paraguayans into taking
to the streets in their thousands and carrying out that arson attack
was an attempt by their incumbent president to change the country’s
Constitution to lift the presidential term limit. Paraguay has wisely
banned the heads of state seeking re-election after serving a five-year
term. Once bitten twice shy, as they say. This constitutional
restriction has been in force since 1992, when that country managed to
restore democracy after a 40-year military rule, to prevent the
emergence of dictatorships. Current President Horacio Cartes sought to
run for President again and had a constitutional amendment to that
effect approved by the Senate. And, all hell broke loose on Saturday.
In
a sharp contrast to the Paraguayans’ reaction to their leader’s
attempt at self-aggrandisement, the introduction of the 18th Amendment
to the Constitution here to do away with the presidential term limit did
not trigger any protests as such. Even the present-day, big-mouthed
champions of good governance meekly voted for it in Parliament,
enabling its passage with a two-thirds majority. Not even the Supreme
Court, then headed by Chief Justice Dr. Shirani Bandaranayake, who
became a heroine after falling from grace and being ousted, took
exception to that seriously flawed constitutional amendment, which
would later prove to be President Mahinda Rajapaksa’s undoing. The rest
is history.
President Cartes apparently took a leaf out of
Rajapaksa’s book, but the intrepid Paraguayans aborted his plan.
However, the fact remains that they took their protest to an extreme.
The controversial bill, which was to be passed by the Congress on
Saturday has been put on hold indefinitely in view of violent protests
which have left a couple of persons dead and many others injured. It is
not likely to see the light of day, according to political observers.
The
second terms of all presidents have been disasters in this country.
Perhaps, Sri Lanka should follow the Paraguayan example and bar
presidents from seeking re-election. What the situation would have been
if President Rajapaksa had succeeded in his attempt to secure a third
term is not difficult to imagine; given the high incidence of
corruption, arrogance of power, cronyism, nepotism, abuse of public
property and the culture of impunity which became manifestly evident
during his second term, people would have taken to the streets, to
bring about a regime change. Perhaps, that was why incumbent President
Maithripala Sirisena, upon being inducted in 2015, publicly declared
that he would not seek re-election though his hangers-on now tell us he
is the best candidate the SLFP can think of fielding at the next
presidential election.
Likewise, it is a mistake for any
political party or a coalition to be allowed to serve two or more terms
consecutively in a country like ours. The biggest ever financial crime
was committed within the first few weeks of the present government
coming to power. There have been endless probes into the Treasury bond
scams and nobody has been arrested so far. One way of making rogues in
the garb of parliamentarians, provincial councillors and local
government members behave is to instil into them the fear of being
defeated at the next election and made to face the consequences of
their actions.
Meanwhile, let the Sirisena-Wickremesinghe
government be warned that denying people their right to exercise their
franchise and elect their representative is to invite disaster. It was
the replacement of a general election with a heavily rigged referendum
in 1982 that plunged the country into a bloodbath and several years of
near anarchy. The JVP tapped public resentment to fuel its macabre
project and wreak havoc.
The yahapalana government had
better overcome its ‘pollsphobia’ and hold the local government
elections without further delay. Its efforts to avoid an electoral
defeat by postponing mini polls are as futile as an attempt to ‘control
dysentery with a loincloth’ as a local saying goes.
No comments:
Post a Comment